I played the 3.0 since they first were out and love the ball. Being 77 with lower swing speed I wanted to try the 2.0 vs the 3.0.
I found that I picked up distance with 2.0 off of driver with ball jumping off of face when flushed. Irons are a little higher with no loss of distance vs 3.0. Stopping ability seems the same since 2.0 is coming in higher.
Putting with the 2.0 was an adjustment. As the 2.0 compresses easier it comes off the putter face hotter, so I had to make an adjustment in my tempo.
Love both balls but I believe I will stai with the 2.0. Gave away a couple of sleeves to buddies with rel good feedback.
Robert L.
Verified Buyer
I recommend this product
Age Range 45 - 54
Handicap 26+
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
Yesterday
Likeable method
I like how your company uses premium urethane covers with a series of different balls for different swing speeds. It is perfect. Very wise indeed.
Steven D.
Verified Buyer
I recommend this product
Age Range 65+
Handicap 16-20
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
3 days ago
Good ball
So far so good
Rev. Daniel H.
Verified Buyer
I recommend this product
Age Range 65+
Handicap 6-10
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
1 week ago
Reverend
Just played a winter 9 holes with the 2.0. Solid ball, long, with no complaints. Carried one in my pocket as well since it was 55 degrees. Changed after every hole. I am sold on the ball and the Snell products. Did not use my new glove. Saving it for spring.
Rex H.
Verified Buyer
I recommend this product
Age Range 55 - 64
Handicap 6-10
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
3 weeks ago
Rharris 2.0
Very good 2 piece ball. Very good distance and feel around the green was way above average for a 2 piece ball. Durability was very good
Loading...
Loading...
Reviews LoadedReviews Added
Subscribe
Sign up to get the latest on sales, new releases and more …